HUMAN SHIELD BOLLOCKS: The ‘clarification’ begins.

Well now, that didn’t take long, did it? Perhaps it was an over-egging too far: ‘wicked bad guy turned yeller and hid behind wifey, what a  swine’.

Osama Bin Laden was worse than a swine: he was a psychopathic megalomaniac. But I spoke/wrote to a half-dozen folks yesterday, and all of us decided that the least believable, cheesiest bit of the ‘Superbama zaps Beardy Loony’ construct to which we’ve all been treated was the ‘hiding-behind-the-defenceless-wife’ shtick. I guess the Obamites did their focus groups and realised it wasn’t going to fly.

I’ll keep repeating this as long as the overwhelming majority of the evidence supports it: the account we’ve been given of what happened in Operation Compound had been sexed up for election purposes. I think there is a very good chance that a part of the operation went wrong, and that for domestic political reasons this has been covered up. The Magnificent Seven reasons outlined earlier today do not seem to me to offer an alternative explanation – but if I hear one, my mind remains open.

Could I stress please that, as some people don’t seem to have achieved primary school reading age yet, this is not a Bin Laden death-denier site. I simply believe – for entirely sane reasons I’ve outlined at length – that the official version is contradictory, mendacious tosh.

PS Many belated thanks to Huffington Post, is decision to ban my comments yesterday resulted in an extra 1,877 hits so far.