There is no such thing as a “good lie”, and no such thing “bad language” when it’s fully deserved

It emerged in a poll this weekend that “Only 25% of voters trust Governments to act in the best interests of national electorates of citizens who vote for them”

It’s hardly surprising they think this in the contemporary context of hugely unpopular globalist New World Order policies to swamp the indigenous nationality with people who don’t like them, spit on their religious beliefs, and behave in in a manner antithetical to all the host nation’s behaviours…in a way infact that simply wouldn’t be tolerated in the African countries I know.

In the dim and distant past, we had Brecht arguing brainlessly for the morality of telling “good lies” as the means to a desirable end (That’s the thing with Communists….they’re not good on the civics of consequences) and then George Orwell’s literary masterpiece Nineteen Eighty Four (where, in the infamous Room 101, you couldn’t be a “good Communist” until you agreed with your interrogator that he was holding up two fingers….no matter how many he was really holding up).

Now in the 20-20s vision of eyesight and provenance, the hypocrisy has slithered further down into the barrel where – right at the slimey bottom – “fact checkers” are in charge of “good lying”.

Robert Malone’s substack today makes a well-timed and justifiably vicious attack on those fact checkers [aka State Lackeys] who pretend to be providing a social service by calling violent inner city no go areas ‘conspiracy theory’. I used to have to travel a lot from London to Rotherham, Wakefield and Halifax. Most of the taxi drivers were Pakistanis – and notorious for being pimps to under-age white girls.

No ideology or well-meaning liberal bourgeois ends can justify a blatant lie on the road to Utopia: the former simply invalidates the latter (See yesterday’s Slogpost)


Doubtless, the prolific substacker Carmel McCormack will receive a Tsunami of emails calling her a quack and a crank for trying to help raise awarenessof the corrupt attack on natural remedies by Global Pharma some years ago. The ‘bungs’ being handed out to senior EU health officials, eventually resulted in near-monopoly control of medicines by the Kaisers at Pfizer.

The reality is that Moringa Tea taken every morning has been shown in endless field studies to lower cholesterol, and reduce the formation of plaque in arteries; the ONLY way to dispose of certain unpleasant types of African fruit fly safely and quickly (they having laid their eggs under your skin) is a remedy to first of all kill the eggs and then destroy the chrysalis; while using cheap and freely available Ivermectin to reduce killer symptoms in 65+ year old victims was more effective than any other single treatment used in Africa.

Globalist Profit involvement in genuine healthcare cures are like oil and water: they don’t mix. The former makes money by creating drug dependence, the latter serves Sovereign Treasuries by getting useful citizens out of hospital and back into economic productivity.


State lying about counterfeit medical achievements attracts vitriol online, and so the holier-than-thou goblins justify censoring the citizenry’s often obscene anger on the basis of “it is found offensive by the vast majority of social media users”. I believe that We the Accused could evade this hypocritical Holiness by using linguistic obscurity to make our dislike of evil people more difficult for AI bots to spot.

For example, I could simply opine that this or that Health Secretary is a

which would put me on the Naughty Step; or I could suggest that

“Your tongue, sir, is a verbose micturating pustule of scandalous obviation and malodorous scatalogical mendacity”.

The vast majority of tin-pot AI used by the gargoyles would not, I submit, know what to do with such pompous writing; whereas I can turn out this stuff by the ton.

“She is a mere biblioklept whose Acnestis is made even harder to reach given the lack of vertebral column to excoriate in the first instance”