EASTER ESSAY: ‘conspiracy theory’ smear & Contrick19 fear (A continuing audit)

While the media world as a whole is rammed solid these days with manipulated euphemism and Orwellian inversions of true meaning, only a few really stand out – and only then for people beyond their mid-fifties who received an open-minded and eclectic education. These few giga-lies are, however, incredibly persuasive. Equally, the ruthless and persistent level of multivariate censorship passes most people by because it is (intentionally) invisible to the untrained eye. The Slog continues his series designed to point out what a risible term of abuse ‘conspiracy theory’ is.

Up but not quite running on the Daily Telegraph website at the moment is a feature article headed State of Fear. It does what the paper tries to do more than most MSM titles at the moment – that is, gently question the morality and veracity of narratives put out by the State on geopolitical ‘news’ stories from Skripal via Brexit to Covid19.

As we’ve come to expect, the Torygraph is fairly consistently three months behind those of us trying to speak out in digital media. But the piece to which I refer does at least suggest that a huge proportion of the media information on offer has been a psy-op:

The courage displayed is both late and diluted: in the real world of the Unwoke Awake – where black people are victims of attitudes far beyond white racism, and Brussels federalists are both malicious and incompetent – there is no ‘intense debate’ about whether State psy-op is deliberate or honest: it almost always turns out, under examination, to be both.

Nevertheless, the cautious temerity of the DT folks is still light years above the Izvestia approach of The Times. Today’s offerings are very much the usual unintentional hilarity:

Yes, doctors and binmen unite – you have nothing to lose but your credibility. Here’s another cracker:

Don’t panic, all you liberty obsessives: vaccination certs to go on holiday, enter pubs, keep your job and keep fit at the gym could be nothing more than a temporary measure lasting no longer than a year (unless a new Maltese variant becomes even less deadly than the Martian one) so don’t worry…and if BoJo breaks his word, then there’s always one of those highly infectious Tory rebellions of 78 MPs to keep him in line.

The last time Boris Johnson kept his word, Lyndon Johnson was in the White House, Brian Johnson was chatting to Peter West about cakes during the cricket commentaries on English radio, and Magic Johnson was about to complete his potty training.

Johnson lied about Elm House evidence, hacking evidence, taxi emissions, his magazine columns, political ambitions, Skripal novochok, marital disloyalty, full Brexit, the size of the Covid “threat”, the likely length of lockdown, and vaccination guaranteeing a summer holiday for all.

But The Times says his promise is worth something more, so there.

There are myriad other reliable sources to use when researching, say, the facts about SarsCovid2. But both the mammoth search engine/browser and social media mogul controllers ensure most people see only what they’re shown. The censorship of both search and content in those businesses is a disgrace to every “democratic” State that tolerates it….as in, every soi-disant democracy.

This is easy to demonstrate by example. I typed ‘World Doctors’ Alliance Website’ into Google yesterday. This is what came up:

First of all, we see the standard yet somehow surreal boast that 82.8 million pages are available to view, and that super-smart Big G pulled them together just for me in 0.76 seconds. This means that, were I to skim down the list at one page per five seconds, I’d have completed the task by 2nd May 2025 some time after 4 pm.

The slightly worrying thing is that this “top” page doesn’t answer the question I asked: all the entries simply tell me why the WDA is heap bad karma bordering on spawn of the Devil, and none of them let me anywhere near the website. (This applied to the first six pages)

So then I went to Brave and got this:

Somewhat more responsive: 4 out of the first 5 sent me to the website, and 1 – picked up from Google – rubbished the organisation as ‘a scam’. I think maybe we’re seeing a trend here….and without boring both you and me, let me add that Duck-Duck Go produced a similar result, but ignored Gargoyle completely – and that gets extra points from me for application of yardbrush to anal exit of Eric Schmidt. (For what it’s worth, Microsoft Edge did pretty much the same thing as Google, minus only the sense of fairness and balance; Gates, Microsoft etc etc)

As it happens, I didn’t choose the WDA at random: I chose it to find out more about the work of eminent Israeli blogger and philosopher, Rabbi Chananya Weissman. Gargoyle says he’s mad, Duck-Duck calls him a very smart eccentric*. Weissman is not to be confused with Alex Weissman who studied under Anthony Fauci at the CDC. Chananya is not you’d call a fan of Doktor Faustus.

These are his 31 reasons why he won’t be having the “vaccine” on offer any time soon:

  1. It’s not a vaccine. A vaccine by definition provides immunity to a disease. This does not provide immunity to anything. In a best-case scenario, it merely reduces the chance of getting a severe case of a virus if one catches it. Hence, it is a medical treatment, not a vaccine. I do not want to take a medical treatment for an illness I do not have.
  2. The drug companies, politicians, medical establishment, and media have joined forces to universally refer to this as a vaccine when it is not one, with the intention of manipulating people into feeling safer about undergoing a medical treatment. Because they are being deceitful, I do not trust them, and want nothing to do with their medical treatment.
  3. The presumed benefits of this medical treatment are minimal and would not last long in any case. The establishment acknowledges this, and is already talking about additional shots and ever-increasing numbers of new “vaccines” that would be required on a regular basis. I refuse to turn myself into a chronic patient who receives injections of new pharmaceutical products on a regular basis simply to reduce my chances of getting a severe case of a virus that these injections do not even prevent.
  4. I can reduce my chances of getting a severe case of a virus by strengthening my immune system naturally. In the event I catch a virus, there are vitamins and well-established drugs that have had wonderful results in warding off the illness, without the risks and unknowns of this medical treatment.
  5. The establishment insists that this medical treatment is safe. They cannot possibly know this because the long-term effects are entirely unknown, and will not be known for many years. They may speculate that it is safe, but it is disingenuous for them to make such a claim that cannot possibly be known. Because they are being disingenuous, I do not trust them, and I want no part of their treatment.
  6. The drug companies have zero liability if anything goes wrong, and cannot be sued. Same for the politicians who are pushing this treatment. I will not inject myself with a new, experimental medical device when the people behind it accept no liability or responsibility if something goes wrong. I will not risk my health and my life when they refuse to risk anything.
  7. Israel’s Prime Minister has openly admitted that the Israeli people are the world’s laboratory for this experimental treatment. I am not interested in being a guinea pig or donating my body to science.
  8. Israel agreed to share medical data of its citizens with a foreign drug company as a fundamental part of their agreement to receive this treatment.I never consented for my personal medical data to be shared with any such entity, nor was I even asked. I will not contribute to this sleazy enterprise.
  9. The executives and board members at Pfizer are on record that they have not taken their own treatment, despite all the fanfare and assurances. They are claiming that they would consider it unfair to “cut the line”. This is a preposterous excuse, and it takes an unbelievable amount of chutzpah to even say such a thing. Such a “line” is a figment of their own imagination; if they hogged a couple of injections for themselves no one would cry foul. In addition, billionaires with private jets and private islands are not known for waiting in line until hundreds of millions of peasants all over the world go first to receive anything these billionaires want for themselves.
  10. The establishment media have accepted this preposterous excuse without question or concern. Moreover, they laud Pfizer’s executives for their supposed self-sacrifice in not taking their own experimental treatment until we go first. Since they consider us such fools, I do not trust them, and do not want their new treatment. They can have my place in line. I’ll go to the very back of the line.
  11. Three facts that must be put together:Bill Gates is touting these vaccines as essential to the survival of the human race. Bill Gates believes the world has too many people and needs to be “depopulated”. Bill Gates, perhaps the richest man in the world, has also not been injected. No rush.
  1. The establishment has been entirely one-sided in celebrating this treatment.The politicians and media are urging people to take it as both a moral and civic duty. The benefits of the treatment are being greatly exaggerated, the risks are being ignored, and the unknowns are being brushed aside. Because they are being deceitful and manipulative, I will not gamble my personal wellbeing on their integrity.
  2. There is an intense propaganda campaign for people to take this treatment.Politicians and celebrities are taking selfies of themselves getting injected (perhaps in some cases pretending to get injected), the media is hyping this as the coolest, smartest, most happy and fun thing to do. It is the most widespread marketing campaign in history. This is not at all appropriate for any medical treatment, let alone a brand new one, and it makes me recoil.
  3. The masses are following in tow, posting pictures of themselves getting injected with a drug, feeding the mass peer pressure to do the same. There is something very alarming and sick about this, and I want no part of it. I never took drugs just because “everyone’s doing it” and it’s cool. I’m certainly not going to start now.
  4. Those who raise concerns about this medical treatment are being bullied, slandered, mocked, censored, ostracized, threatened, and fired from their jobs. This includes medical professionals who have science-based concerns about the drug and caregivers who have witnessed people under their charge suffering horrible reactions and death shortly after being injected. When the establishment is purging good people who risk everything simply to raise concerns about a new medical treatment — even if they don’t outright oppose it — I will trust these brave people over the establishment every time. I cannot think of a single similar case in history when truth and morality turned out to be on the side of the establishment.
  5. This is the greatest medical experiment in the history of the human race.
  6. It is purposely not being portrayed as the greatest medical experiment in the history of the human race, and the fact that it is a medical experiment at all is being severely downplayed.
  7. Were they up front with the masses, very few would agree to participate in such an experiment. Manipulating the masses to participate in a medical experiment under false pretenses violates the foundations of medical ethics and democratic law. I will not allow unethical people who engage in such conduct to inject me with anything.
  8. The medical establishment is not informing people about any of this. They have become marketing agents for an experimental drug, serving huge companies and politicians who have made deals with them. This is a direct conflict with their mandate to concern themselves exclusively with the wellbeing of the people under their care. Since the medical establishment has become corrupted, and has become nothing more than a corporate and political tool, I do not trust the experimental drug they want so badly to inject me with.
  9. We are being pressured in various ways to get injected, which violates medical ethics and the foundations of democratic society. The best way to get me not to do something is to pressure me to do it.
  10. The government has sealed their protocol related to the virus and treatments for THIRTY YEARS. This is information that the public has a right to know, and the government has a responsibility to share. What are they covering up? Do they really expect me to believe that everything is kosher about all this, and that they are concerned first and foremost with my health? The last time they did this was with the Yemenite Children Affair. If you’re not familiar with it, look it up. Now they’re pulling the same shtick. They didn’t fool me the first time, and they’re definitely not fooling me now.
  11. The government can share our personal medical data with foreign corporations, but they won’t share their own protocol on the matter with us? I’m out.
  12. The establishment has recruited doctors, rabbis, the media, and the masses to harangue people who don’t want to get injected with a new drug. We are being called the worst sort of names. We are being told that we believe in crazy conspiracies, that we are against science, that we are selfish, that we are murderers, that we don’t care about the elderly, that it’s our fault that the government continues to impose draconian restrictions on the public. It’s all because we don’t want to get injected with an experimental treatment, no questions asked. We are even being told that we have a religious obligation to do this, and that we are grave sinners if we do not. They say that if we do not agree to get injected, we should be forced to stay inside our homes forever and be ostracized from public life.

This is horrific, disgusting, a perversion of common sense, morality, and the Torah. It makes me recoil, and only further cements my distrust of these people and my opposition to taking their experimental drug. How dare they?

  1. I know of many people who got injected, but none of them studied the science in depth, carefully weighed the potential benefits against the risks, compared this option to other alternatives, was truly informed, and decided this medical treatment was the best option for them. On the contrary, they got injected because of the hype, the propaganda, the pressure, the fear, blind trust in what “the majority of experts” supposedly believed (assuming THEY all studied everything in depth and were completely objective, which is highly dubious), blind trust in what certain influential rabbis urged them to do (ditto the above), or hysterical fear that the only option was getting injected or getting seriously ill from the virus. When I see mass hysteria and cult-like behavior surrounding a medical treatment, I will be extremely suspicious and avoid it.
  2. The drug companies have a long and glorious history of causing mass carnage with wonder drugs they thrust on unsuspecting populations, even after serious problems had already become known. Instead of pressing the pause button and halting the marketing of these drugs until these issues could be properly investigated, the drug companies did everything in their power to suppress the information and keep pushing their products. When companies and people have demonstrated such gross lack of concern for human life, I will not trust them when they hype a new wonder drug. This isn’t our first rodeo.
  3. Indeed, the horror stories are already coming in at warp speed, but the politicians are not the least bit concerned, the medical establishment is brushing them aside as unrelated or negligible, the media is ignoring it, the drug companies are steaming ahead at full speed, and those who raise a red flag continue to be bullied, censored, and punished. Clearly my life and my wellbeing are not their primary concern. I will not be their next guinea pig in their laboratory. I will not risk being the next “coincidence”.
  4. Although many people have died shortly after getting injected — including perfectly healthy young people — we are not allowed to imply that the injection had anything to do with it. Somehow this is anti-science and will cause more people to die. I believe that denying any possible link, abusing people who speculate that there might be a link, and demonstrating not the slightest curiosity to even explore if there might be a link is what is anti-science and could very well cause more people to die. These same people believe I am obligated to get injected as well. No freaking thanks.
  5. I am repulsed by the religious, cult-like worship of a pharmaceutical product, and will not participate in this ritual.
  6. My “healthcare” provider keeps badgering me to get injected, yet they have provided me no information on this treatment or any possible alternatives.Everything I know I learned from others outside the establishment. Informed consent has become conformed consent. I decline.
  7. I see all the lies, corruption, propaganda, manipulation, censorship, bullying, violation of medical ethics, lack of integrity in the scientific process, suppression of inconvenient adverse reactions, dismissal of legitimate concerns, hysteria, cult-like behavior, ignorance, closed-mindedness, fear, medical and political tyranny, concealment of protocols, lack of true concern for human life, lack of respect for basic human rights and freedoms, perversion of the Torah and common sense, demonization of good people, the greatest medical experiment of all time being conducted by greedy, untrustworthy, godless people, the lack of liability for those who demand I risk everything… I see all this and I have decided they can all have my place in line. I will put my trust in God. I will use the mind He blessed me with and trust my natural instincts.

Which leads to the final reason which sums up why I will not get “vaccinated.”

  1. The Whole thing Stinks.

Long-term Sloggers will instantly see Rabbi Weissman as a man after my own heart: his sense of wry Jewish irony glows in every sentence, and nails Contrick19 to the cross it so richly deserves. Perhaps my analogy is not the one many would use on an Easter weekend, but I am not hewn from the many. Jokes like “Vot a vay to spend Easter!” are very much my schtick: may your God go with you, and help everyone to see the shock element bad taste sometimes has to deliver.

*For the record, Weissman (Left) has wisely shunned Wikipedia. He is a phenominally bright educationalist with radical ideas about what’s right and wrong with Jew and Gentile in the 21st century. He is a funny and grounded Wise Man (gerritt??) and thus worth a thousand blinkered medical expert mutants.

But there is yet more. Dr Keith Scott-Mumby received a Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MB ChB), which is the British equivalent of the American MD. He then departed into alternative healing interests and studied alternative psychology and nutrition. The big shift came for him with explorations into the phenomenon of food allergy. He opened one of the world’s first alternative allergy clinics in Manchester, The Food and Environmental Allergy Clinic. He was one of the founding members of a society in Britain then known as the Society for Clinical Ecology and in August 2005, he was appointed associate professor at the Capital University for Integrative Medicine in Washington DC.

Like me (he opened pompously) he does actually understand why the PCR “testing” technique used to identify the Covid Unclean is a hoax so outrageous, we should all look twice and twice again at every statistic aspiring to be an accurate measure of SarsCov2 cases.

This is what he entirely accurately has to say on the subject: (my emphases)

No matter how many times you replicate a snatch of DNA, it’s still only a string of DNA bits, not a virus.In testing, the fragments of DNA are stacked up, deliberately. It’s called polymerizing and is how we make nylon and other synthetic materials. You get plenty of it to measure, but it’s NOT a virus. In fact the inventor of the PCR test, Kary B. Mullis, said the test cannot be used to measure viral load, which is crucial. 

In studying infectious diseases, the quantity of pathogens present is a measure of how likely a person is to spread the disease. Since quantity is being artificially inflated by concatenation (polymerization) it tells us nothing about the disease status.

Mullis actually stated: “Quantitative PCR is an oxymoron.” PCR is intended to identify substances qualitatively, but by its very nature is unsuited for estimating numbers.

Mullis was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1993 for his invention.

Enter German virologist Christian Drosten, based at Charité University Hospital, Berlin. He fangled the COVID test on a computer and then had it tested on clinical cases. He didn’t have the virus. IN FACT NOBODY HAS, OR HAS HAD, THE VIRUS SINCE DAY 1. The “specimen” on which all the brouhaha is based came from China and, incredibly, even now, no validation has been performed by the authorship based on isolated SARS-CoV-2 viruses or full length RNA thereof.

Famously, the President of Tanzania rejected Drosten tests after a goat, a papaya, and engine oil tested positive. The apologists and shills have had trouble discrediting that one and the best they can come up with is “we don’t know what test was actually used”.’

Damning stuff: the entire testing process upon which SAGE “advice” has been based – and size of “pandemic” calculated – is uselessly misleading. But then, Slog regulars knew this way back in November 2020.

Earlier this this year, in mid-March, Tanzanian President John Pombe Magufuli – a persistent and outspoken critic of Big Pharma propaganda and vaccine overclaim – suddenly contracted Covid19, with which he died due to known heart complications. Oddly enough, in March 2020, a persistent and outspoken critic of Lockdown, Boris Johnson, contracted Covid19 (along with colleagues Dominic Cummings and Matt Hancock) soon after chairing a N°10 meeting that included Neil ‘Shagger’ Ferguson the infamous Trotskyite modelling flake. There is little doubt that Ferguson infected all of them. Johnson very nearly died with known obesity complications. Sir Mark Sedwill used the political vacuum thus created to try one last time to hijack the Brexit negotiations and turn the outcome into an abject British surrender. Cummings made an unexpectedly swift recovery and reversed Sedwill’s treasonous interference. Ferguson is a hard-left socialist whose mistress is an Antifa sympathiser. He has, since 2005, developed hopelessly inaccurate epidemic models that together are estimated to have cost the UK food economy £27.5 billion.