VACCINE DEATHS: time for another colour of card?

The Yellow Card Covid19 “vaccine” reports do not illuminate any of the darkness surrounding the real dangers of testing genetic-theory jabs on human beings. Their data-collection is a dereliction of the State’s duty to keep its citizens safe, and (by definition) completely ignores the medium-term Cytokinic consequences. In this deconstruction of Whitty balm, The Slog raises the broader issue of data perversion in the process of controlling mass populations.

When supposely non-partisan State statistics can’t be trusted, then free-speech democracy is as good as dead. The rot set in during the final quarter of the last century when finance ministers across Europe began “controlling” inflation by simply removing from basket-calculations anything going up in price. Next came Slick Willy in the US, and his decision – once benefit claimants had reached the allowed welfare limit – to record them as having “found employment”. I realised the end was in sight for Italy when it became clear that meteo forecasters were taking bribes from beach resorts to keep predicting hot, dry weather.

As the 2008-9 financial crash hove into view, it was clear that every ratings agency from S&P downwards had been paid a lot of money to keep junk looking like quality. Obama calmed the voters down by changing the definitions of ‘illegal’, ‘Mexican’ and ‘immigrants’. In the UK, Cameron and Osborne stopped segmenting ‘jobs’ – treating a broom-pusher as somehow the same as a hitech CEO. Once Draghi got his Goldman squid tentacles round the European Central Bank, most bond traders with any sense stopped taking notice of the ECB’s stats…especially those related to Greece, Spain and, oddly enough, Italy.

Somehow, Blighty’s smug and/or gullible citizens continue to see this as something Johnny Foreigner does “but it couldn’t happen here”. The Yellow Card weekly vaccine adverse-reactions data issued by Gov.UK provides an avalanche of evidence to prove them wrong. Needless to say (needle-less?) their Anti-Truth shields will fend it off.

The opening paragraphs of each weekly Yellow Card report are pure pharmafia propaganda.

‘Vaccination is the single most effective way to reduce deaths and severe illness from COVID-19’. That simply isn’t true: the longest-tested management drugs for mortality reduction are Ivermectin and HCQ/Zinc. Under 2% of all Indians have been “vaccinated” against SarsCovi2, but their deaths per million are a fraction of ours.

‘Three COVID-19 vaccines, Pfizer/BioNTech, COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca and COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna, are currently being used in the UK. All have been authorised for supply by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) following a thorough review of safety, quality and efficacy information from clinical trials.’ Flagrantly untrue: they have only an ’emergency usage’ certificate from the MHRA, whose more thorough study of the risks involved will not be completed until Spring 2023 at the earliest.

‘Widespread use of the vaccine now suggests that severe allergic reactions to the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine are very rare. Anaphylaxis can also be a very rare side effect associated with most other vaccines. Following very substantial exposure across the UK population, no other new safety concerns have been identified from reports received so far.’ Yet more whitewash: Astrazeneca is carefully left out, and Yellow Card reporting of all allergic reactions has been shown to be, at very best, patchy. Anaphylaxis is not generally associated ‘with most other vaccines’. And no other vaccines use the untried genetic stimulus approach of the new ones.

Finally, nowhere in these opening paragraphs will you find any summarised stats about allergic or mortal reactions to the experimental formulations in use.

As the opening conclusions continue, however, a tone only just this side of hard-sell prevails: “extremely rare” as a term is used no less than four times, and once again the opening lie is repeated: ‘Vaccines are the best way to protect people from COVID-19 and have already saved thousands of lives. Everyone should continue to get their vaccination when asked to do so unless specifically advised otherwise.’

I use the emphasis on ‘everyone’ above, because I regard that as the biggest lie in the entire series. The best way – by far – for everyone under 50 (with no complicatory pathogens) to protect themselves is to catch Covid19, get over it, become naturally immune – and move on. People have short memories (upon which manipulative rulers gorge) but Western citizens are slowly being persuaded of danger when they very clearly are not in any: as global numbers with a long series continue to emphasise, even over 60s would be unlikely to die (at 4 in a 100) and below the age of 45, 99.73% will not even require hospitalisation, let alone preparation for a shroud.

Where the age element of vaccination “advice” falls apart at the seams is when it erroneously suggests that you should get vaccinated ‘to protect others’. But logically, if the most vulnerable come first (as was the overwhelming opinion until late last year) then – if the vaccines are as effective as they say – the ‘protect others’ rationale becomes silly once the vulnerable are jabbed: and in the real world, there has to be a statute of limitations here….if the vulnerable don’t want the jab, well then – hard luck. After all, they have only Ivermectin et al to fall back upon, poor dears – and such things only cut mortality by 85%. Apologies for the club-footed application to the irony pedal, but we pacifists have to vent our spleen somehow.

And so into the meat of these weekly reports. At this point, hard-sell turns into frequent throat-clearing defensiveness. Here’s a lulu:

‘we need to very quickly establish if any serious medical events which are related to vaccination are merely a coincidental association. These associations are likely while we are still in the midst of a national epidemic, and because many of the millions of people offered the vaccine in the early phase of a vaccination campaign are elderly and/or have underlying medical conditions, which increases the likelihood of unrelated illnesses occurring soon after vaccination’.

I don’t remember such niceties being applied by the exaggerating Angels of Plague Death in Spring 2020: what I largely remember about that period is everyone in care homes not eaten by rampaging tigers being put down as a Covid death…with no distinction at all between ‘with’ and ‘from’. Yet again we’re faced with the ‘High in Covidness, Low in vaccineness’ hypocrisy.

But when it comes to big fat fibs, this one takes the biscuit: (my emphases)

‘As with any vaccine, the COVID-19 vaccines will cause side effects in some people. The total number and the nature of Yellow Cards reported so far is not unusual for a new vaccine for which members of the public and healthcare professionals are encouraged to report any suspected adverse reaction’

The second fib exacerbates the first: it is an outright lie to suggest that frontline medics are ‘encouraged’ to report suspect symptoms suggesting contraindication – and the same is true of the CDC in the States. Here are just two examples of US and UK nurses/gps who have written to me by the dozen with their own tales of airy-fairy State disinterest:

‘This old lady, a patient of mine for years, I gave her this vaccine and half an hour later she was dead. So I rang the relevant authorities, and having been passed around like a parcel-bomb for an age, they put me on hold, like forever. So I emailed them and the next day called again to say did you get the mail and they said, oh sure. I think the under-reporting of vax reactions is probably endemic.’

‘When [name withheld] collapsed on his way out of the practice reception, the ambulance arrived really quickly, but he didn’t make it to A&E. When I called the number to report it, they didn’t offer me a ticket-number, just said fine, leave it with us. All my life, I’ve associated that phrase with “we don’t want to know”. No demand for me to put it in writing. It struck me as unscientific and amateurish.’

Whatever SAGE or anyone else from PHE to the DoH tells you, were are back in the land of historical back-writing on this issue: the stated medical bureaucratic tradition with new drugs has always been to err on the side of extreme caution. But then, a lot of that is to do with fear of litigation….and as we know with the Covid19 Pharmafia scam, they have full immunity from prosecution.

Here’s another beaut:

‘The MHRA’s guidance remains that those with a previous history of allergic reactions to the ingredients of the vaccine should not receive it.’

No shit? But hey – while we’re down there – how do you know you’re allergic to some obscure mRNA that’s never been used before? It’s beyond parody.

The bottom line is that – at the end of this “thorough” scrutiny of experimental drugs via the Yellow Card scheme – the longer the report goes on, the more sloppy the explanations get.

‘The estimated number of doses administered differs from the estimated number of people vaccinated due to the different data sources used’

Most reassuring, thank you. And then this final arse-patch:

‘A report of a suspected ADR to the Yellow Card scheme does not necessarily mean that it was caused by the vaccine, only that the reporter has a suspicion it may have been….It is important to note that Yellow Card data cannot be used to derive side effect rates or compare the safety profile of COVID-19 vaccinations, as many factors can influence ADR reporting.’

In short, we have devised a pointless, ramshackle and irrelevant monitor of safety to offer balm to those who are easily persuaded that pigs with wings are a major threat to airline safety.

If you sense that the placard I’m holding in this post is ‘Deliberate Dereliction of Duty’ then yes, you’ve got it in 3-D.

But if you’re still not convinced that the health bureucrats are extracting the urine, try this classic pointed out to me (by Slog threader Horseman) from page 18 of the British Govt Roadmap Step 2 prediction for next winter: (my emphases)

’56. This shows that most deaths and admissions in a post-Roadmap resurgence are in people who have received two vaccine doses, even without vaccine protection waning or a variant emerging that escapes vaccines. This is because vaccine uptake has been so high in the oldest age groups (modelled here at 95% in the over 50-year olds). There are therefore 5% of over 50-year olds who have not been vaccinated, and 95% x 10% = 9.5% of over 50-year olds who are vaccinated but, nevertheless, not protected against death. This is not the result of vaccines being ineffective, merely uptake being so high.”

This is the product of a mind diseased by Numerical Constipation Syndrome: on its own admission, even without vaccine protection waning, 9.5% of over 50s will still die…but from high uptake, not crap vaccines. So low uptake would be the solution, yes? Nothing acts faster than Anadin, so take nothing.

It was our old friend Mark Twain who wrote, ‘Some conclusions are so stupid, only the most intelligent would ever believe them’. Thirty years later, G K Chesterton observed, ‘We are ruled by fools, clocks and liars’.

Plus ça change.